Consent to Test
the Shroud
In 1986, the Roman Catholic Church
gave their consented to allow carbon dating to take place on the Shroud.
Before they had said that carbon dating would cause too much damage to the
shroud, but scientific advancements had been made to the extent that a
dating could be made from using only 5mg of cloth.
Samples were taken from the Shroud
on 21 April, 1988, and given to laboratories in Arizona, Oxford and Zurich
for testing. To ensure accuracy, control samples were given from pieces of
cloth of known origin, but the origins of the control samples were not
made known to the participants. The four pieces of cloth were:
A Twist to the Carbon dating theory
tail?
The shroud is unquestionably old.
Its history is known from the year 1357, when it surfaced in the tiny
village of Lirey, France. Until recent reports from San Antonio, most of
the scientific world accepted the findings of carbon dating carried out in
1988. The results said the shroud dated back to 1260-1390, much too new to
be Jesus' burial linen.
Now the date and other shroud
controversies are under intense scrutiny because of discoveries by a team
led by Leoncio Garza-Valdes, MD and Stephen Mattingly, PhD, professor of
microbiology.
After months examining microscopic
samples in 1996, the team concluded in January that the Shroud of Turin is
centuries older than its carbon date. Dr. Garza said the shroud's fibers
are coated with bacteria and fungi that have grown for centuries. Carbon
dating, he said, had sampled the contaminants as well as the fibers'
cellulose.
Such startling findings ordinarily
would be published in a scientific journal, but the team has waited. The
shroud's ultimate custodian, the Catholic Church, has declined to
designate the San Antonio fibers as an official sample. Dr. Garza received
them in Turin, Italy, in 1993 from Giovanni Riggi di Numana, who took the
official shroud samples for the carbon dating in the '80s.
Dr. Garza's hypothesis, however,
transcends the shroud, and it is being taken seriously by archaeologists,
microbiologists, and even those most closely associated with carbon
dating.
"This is not a crazy
idea," said Harry E. Gove, PhD, co-inventor of the use of accelerator
mass spectrometry for carbon dating. Dr. Gove is professor emeritus of
physics at the University of Rochester in New York.
"A swing of 1,000 years would
be a big change, but it's not wildly out of the question, and the issue
needs to be resolved," he said.